--- title: "Navigating competition law in pursuit of environmental sustainability – Wen & Co." description: "Sustainability collaborations between competitors can run into competition law. How regulators abroad are responding, and the gap in Malaysian guidance." canonical: "https://www.wenlaw.co/insights/competition-law-environmental-sustainability/" updated: "2026-10-22T10:22:35Z" --- # Navigating competition law in pursuit of environmental sustainability – Wen & Co. [Insights](https://www.wenlaw.co/insights/) Competition·30 Apr 2023·By Nicole Leong # Navigating competition law in pursuit of environmental sustainability Sustainability collaborations between competitors can run into competition law. How regulators abroad are responding, and the gap in Malaysian guidance. Environmental sustainability and climate change have become increasingly important agendas for businesses and governments locally and globally. In recent years, businesses and industries are increasingly seeking to enter into collaborations, alliances or agreements with one another to approach sustainability initiatives, such as agreements to establish common standards or to promote sustainable sourcing practices. While such collaborations, alliances or agreements can be beneficial in promoting environmental sustainability, they also raise potential competition law concerns. Competition law is designed to prohibit anti-competitive behavior, such as collusion between competitors or the abuse of a dominant market position. When businesses enter into agreements with one another, there is a risk that such agreements could be viewed as anti-competitive and thereby infringe competition law. One of the key concerns with sustainability collaborations, alliances or agreements is that they could be seen as a form of collusion between competitors. For example, agreements between competitors to fix prices for products meeting an agreed environmental sustainability standard may be seen as anti-competitive. In 2016, the environmental pledge by the world’s largest palm oil-producing companies in Indonesia towards zero deforestation was disbanded following a threat by Indonesia’s anti-monopoly agency to investigate the group for cartel-like practices. To avoid such competition law risks, it is important for businesses to ensure that their sustainability collaborations, alliances or agreements are structured in a way that is compliant with competition law. One approach to doing so is to seek guidance from competition law experts, who can help companies to identify potential competition law issues and structure their collaborations, alliances or agreements in a way that is compliant with competition law. Businesses can also consider seeking exemptions for their sustainability collaboration, alliances or agreements from the relevant competition authority. While this approach can be time-consuming, it can provide assurance that the collaboration, alliance or agreement is compliant with competition law and reduce the risk of enforcement action being taken against the businesses involved. In the UK, its Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) recently released a draft guidance on environmental sustainability agreements with a focus on climate change. The draft guidance on environmental sustainability agreements can be found [here](https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-guidance-on-environmental-sustainability-agreements). The draft guidance sets out the CMA’s views on how it will assess the competition law implications of environmental sustainability agreements which capture agreements between competitors and potential competitors that are aimed at preventing, reducing or mitigating the adverse impact that economic activities have on environmental sustainability. The draft guidance provides examples of the types of environmental sustainability agreements that are likely to be compatible with competition law. For example, a joint campaign to raise awareness about environmental sustainability issues within the industry or among customers. In another example, joint lobbying for policy or legislative changes without sharing competitively sensitive information between competitors. However, agreements to limit their ability to innovate in order to meet or exceed a sustainability goal or to achieve that goal more quickly would be considered anti-competitive. The CMA’s draft guidance is an important step in clarifying the competition law implications of sustainability agreements from the regulator’s perspective. In Malaysia, the lack of clear guidelines from the competition regulators may discourage businesses from working together to pursue environmental sustainability initiatives. It is important to ensure that competition laws do not hinder legitimate collaborations between businesses that are crucial for promoting and protecting environmental sustainability. Therefore, the publication of detailed guidance by the competition regulators would be beneficial in providing assurance to businesses looking to collaborate with each other. In conclusion, collaborations, alliances and agreements can be important tools for promoting environmental sustainability, but they also raise potential competition law concerns. Businesses should be aware of these risks and take steps to structure their collaborations, alliances or agreements in a way that is compliant with competition law. By doing so, businesses can help to promote environmental sustainability confidently while avoiding enforcement action and other legal risks associated with anti-competitive behavior. *This article is authored by our Principal, Ms. Nicole Leong. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author’s alone and do not constitute any legal advice. For further information or advice on Competition Law and Antitrust, kindly contact Ms. Nicole Leong.* ![Nicole Leong](https://www.wenlaw.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/nicole-leong.jpeg) Nicole Leong Managing Partner More insights## Related writing. [Competition### MediAsas and competition law in Malaysia: where healthcare billing reform meets the Competition Act 2010 As MediAsas rolls out, common billing frameworks for hospitals and insurers can improve transparency, but agreeing on charges or rates risks infringing the Competition Act 2010. Nicole Leong05 Nov 2026](https://www.wenlaw.co/insights/mediasas-competition-law-healthcare-billing/) [Competition### Client alert: MyCC's bid rigging proposed decision in public food and cleaning tenders MyCC has issued proposed decisions against 18 enterprises over 30 government food-supply and cleaning tenders worth RM108.3 million. What happens next, and what affected enterprises should do. Wen & Co.29 Oct 2026](https://www.wenlaw.co/insights/mycc-bid-rigging-proposed-decision-food-cleaning-tenders/) [Competition### Legitimate tender support or bid rigging? When does engaging a 3rd party agent or consultant in a tender process give rise to a risk of infringing Malaysia's Competition Act 2010? MyCC's AADK food-supply tender decision shows how a shared tender agent or consultant can become a channel for bid rigging, and what bidders should check before the next tender. Nicole Leong19 Oct 2026](https://www.wenlaw.co/insights/tender-agents-consultants-bid-rigging-risk/) Get in touch## Tell us about your matter. Your enquiry will be reviewed by us, and we aim to respond within one business day. All enquiries are treated in strict confidence. [Book a confidential consultation](https://www.wenlaw.co/contact/) [Call us](tel:+60162188570)